JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 25, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Rafael Antonio Torres Naranjo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden departamental
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia residual
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia para evitar dilaciones injustificadas y proteger derechos fundamentales
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se dejó sin efecto el auto proferido por la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga, toda vez que la colisión suscitada, en el presente caso, entre el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de San Pedro (Valle) y el Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Tuluá debió ser resuelta por el citado Tribunal de conformidad con lo ordenado en el Art. 18 de la Ley 270 de 1996.

En consecuencia, se ordenó al Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Tuluá (Valle), que asuma el conocimiento de la acción de tutela de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTO el auto proferido por la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga, el 15 de abril de 2004.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Tulua (Valle), que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.